Jim Stewartson’s “Absurd” explores existential crises

The content expresses deep concern about the current political climate in America, emphasizing a growing disconnect between the federal government’s narrative and objective reality. It highlights former President Trump’s declining approval ratings as an indication that fewer people are aligning with the official story being promoted by the government, particularly regarding events in Portland. The author critiques a narrative suggesting that a violent “Antifa” group is undermining the city, characterizing this as a baseless conspiracy promoted by figures like Stephen Miller.A significant point in the piece is the examination of a recent presidential memorandum titled “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence” (NSPM-7). The memorandum is criticized for its selective interpretation of incidents, particularly in referencing bullets engraved with supposed “anti-fascist” rhetoric from the murder case involving Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin. The author argues that this interpretation mischaracterizes the killer’s motivations as influenced by broader anti-fascist ideologies, rather than being rooted in naïve nihilism stemming from right-wing propaganda.

Furthermore, the NSPM-7 memorandum identifies various groups and ideologies as threats, including self-identified anti-fascists, anti-American sentiment, and opposition to traditional values regarding family and religion. This broad categorization raises concerns about the implications for individuals who oppose mainstream views, as dissenters could be unfairly labeled as extremists. The author underscores the irony that anti-fascism, which is depicted negatively in this context, has historically been a crucial American value.

In touching on the historical significance of these issues, the author references Voltaire’s quote that warns about the dangers of believing absurdities. By likening the current political rhetoric to historical events, they stress the potential for harmful consequences stemming from manipulated public perception and ideological extremism.

Lastly, the author invites readers to engage in a supportive discussion through a scheduled Zoom meeting for subscribers, emphasizing the importance of community and conversation in navigating the tumultuous political landscape. They seek to reassure the audience that they are not alone in their thoughts and feelings regarding these issues, fostering a sense of solidarity among those who share similar concerns.