Bureaucratic swarms undermine America in blue states

The excerpt reflects deep-seated frustrations with government bureaucracy, tracing a parallel from the sentiments expressed in the Declaration of Independence to contemporary issues under President Donald Trump’s administration. The author highlights the Founding Fathers’ disdain for the British administrative overreach and suggests that a similar sentiment exists today regarding the expansive growth of government agencies, especially since Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal. This historical context sets the stage for a critique of the current state of governance, painting bureaucracy as a significant barrier to individual liberty and effective public service.

A focal point of this critique is the Department of Education, which has operated for decades with substantial funding yet failed to demonstrate a tangible positive impact on educational outcomes. The author resonates with Trump’s stance on dismantling ineffective bureaucracies, expressing a sense of empowerment among those disillusioned with the current system. When faced with the potential layoffs of education department staff, the author encourages a spirited response akin to that of the revolutionary era, signaling a desire for accountability and reform.

The narrative transitions to specific examples of bureaucratic failures in blue states, particularly in Los Angeles. City Controller Kenneth Mejia stands out as a key figure battling governmental inefficiencies and corruption. His revelations about budget cuts juxtaposed with rising incidents of fraud and waste underscore a troubling disconnect within city governance. Mejia’s continuous attempts to audit homelessness-related expenditures are met with resistance, highlighting a defensive bureaucracy that appears to seek to obscure malfeasance rather than root it out.

In Minnesota, a parallel story unfolds with significant allegations of fraud in state-run programs, particularly in the wake of federal COVID-19 funding. Acting U.S. Attorney Joe Long’s indictments bring to light vast sums of money misappropriated through fraudulent schemes. The scale of the fraud—amounting to billions—raises alarming questions about systemic incompetence and potential complicity among public officials. This draws a stark contrast with the original governmental intentions of providing support to vulnerable populations, leading to public outcry for clarity and justice.

Ultimately, the article posits that citizens are dissatisfied not only with the corruption evident at various levels of government but also with the overarching bureaucratic structure that allows such abuses to thrive. Drawing from Eric Hoffer’s observations on the evolution of societal movements into self-serving enterprises, the author calls for a return to the principles of governance envisioned by the Founding Fathers. The aspiration is for a government that serves the public good rather than becomes a vehicle for personal gain, emphasizing the urgent need for reform to halt the rampant inefficiencies and corruption.