Trump had a revealing moment at the UN like the fable

During President Trump’s speech at the United Nations’ 80th annual session on September 23, he raised pointed questions about the organization’s relevance and effectiveness, likening it to a “thingamajig” with no clear purpose. His remarks resonated with a public disillusioned by the UN’s perceived inefficiencies and failures, particularly its inability to fulfill its primary mission of establishing global peace. Trump criticized the UN as overly bureaucratic, expensive, and biased, suggesting it has become a vehicle for leftist ideologies and has failed to respect its own principles of international law.

Trump reviewed the UN’s historical shortcomings, illustrating its lack of impact during significant conflicts such as the Korean War and the Cold War. He asserted that he successfully engaged in resolving multiple global conflicts unassisted by the UN. Furthermore, he chastised the organization for creating divisive agencies like UNESCO and WHO, which have faced scandals and questioned their effectiveness, even withdrawing U.S. support for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) due to its perceived failures.

The president shifted his focus to immigration policies, criticizing the supposed alignment between the UN and the EU in promoting immigration from the global South to the Northern Hemisphere. He claimed this policy undermined the integrity and sovereignty of European nations and warned that it could threaten the cultural identity of those societies. Trump characterized the current immigration and climate policies as a colossal deception that aimed to displace European populations.

In discussing regional tensions, Trump condemned Western nations for recognizing Palestine, describing it as rewarding Hamas and hampering peace efforts. He also criticized China and India for supporting Russia amid the Ukraine conflict, highlighting Europe’s hypocrisy in pretending to stand with Ukraine while still purchasing Russian energy. During this context, he urged NATO to distance itself from the European Union, which he deemed detrimental to its mission.

After his assertive address, Trump signaled a shift in his approach toward Ukraine, distancing himself from previous critiques of President Zelensky and advocating for increased support for Kyiv. He expressed a more proactive stance, suggesting military actions against Russia, and acknowledged that Ukraine could potentially regain lost territories. This recalibration indicated responsiveness to internal party pressures and reflected a more hawkish perspective on international security affairs. Trump’s evolution suggests a willingness to reconcile differing viewpoints within his political base even amidst evolving global dynamics.